BIOL 2200

1. Don't do the reading. It's waste of time. Record the lectures & take thorough notes and memorize all the details b4 the exams.
2. Don't give up b/c you're getting bad grade ... whatever grade you don't really want to get until the last.
3. Lab TA is essentially a russian roulette... My roommate and I submitted almost identical answer for these two questions (we did not cheat, we have a lab at the same time so it's impossible to cheat), but her TA gave her full point and I got 75% off, and it sucked cuz it was 3 points question. But this is also doable if you get all the pre-lab answers correct AND you don't make any stupid mistakes on your lab.
4. For exams, they are often VERY detail oriented. No it may not be enough to know the general trend. It's not an exaggeration to know all the details, I can't stress how much you need to know the lecture material by heart. Also I wouldn't skip class b/c it's annoying and anxious to listen to lecture recordings 5 hours before the exam starts.

I took this class after thinking I would be a politics major and having a bad experience. I hadn't taken AP Bio or AP Chem or BIOL 2100 or any of the classes that it seemed all the other people who take this class did. My relevant science experience includes 9th grade biology and 10th grade chemistry. You could say I was terrified to take this class. After taking it, however, I'm so glad I did. I learned so much from Manson and she is a really engaging lecturer. I did the readings for the first three exams but not the last. I got a really high first exam grade, a lowish second exam grade, a pretty good third exam grade, and a good fourth exam grade. Readings, it seems, don't really matter that much so read if you want near the end of the unit to review for the exam. Do the pre-labs well by reading all the information about the lab. If you do that, you shouldn't have a problem getting a 100 on all of them. Labs are graded kind of confusingly, but if you are good with your time management and kinda say a bunch of stuff for each question, you're bound to get the points somewhere in your answer. My lab grade ended up being around a 96. Try your best on mastering bio and do it with a friend as she recommends. If you like 10 questions throughout the semester that's ok because the last mastering bio is extra credit and you can bump that grade up to a 100. Going into this class, I expected nothing better than a B and I'm leaving with an A and I renewed love for science. I'm strongly considering majoring in biology or something related now because of Manson's class.

Exams in this class are difficult and confusing.

This class is a bit harder than you may imagine. I did not take BIOL 2100, so I cannot compare it to that, but I was definitely surprised. This is not a course you can skimp on and expect good grades. It is essential to not only go to lecture, but read the textbook, get those lab points, and do the Mastering Biology (and TopHat if that is still happening). The tests are quite tricky, and it is important to go over the Dynamic Study Modules in the Mastering Biology when you are studying, and doing the practice test. Manson is a good and dynamic lecturer, and you can tell she really knows what she is talking about. There is just a lot of content to keep up with. If you keep up with all of the moving elements in this class, you will be fine. If you fall behind, it will feel like a nightmare when the test comes around. If you took AP or IB biology in high school, several concepts will feel very familiar.

This class was hard af for me and I studied my butt off. Professor Mason is very charismatic but not so much on her exams. I know a lot of people who struggled in this class so I know I'm not the only one. My recommendation is if you have to take this class is to watch videos to solidify your understand because if you kinda know the material, you will not pass the exam. take it from me who had to learn the hard way.

I would not recommend taking this class unless you need to. Professor Manson is a pretty nice woman and she is respected for her own research on insects, but she is a horrible teacher. Unlike 2100 she actually has a lot of words in her powerpoints to take notes from but she basically just reads off them so you would almost be better off just reading the powerpoints on your own at your own speed. Her tests are unreasonably difficult (she probably made the last two harder out of suspicion for people cheating but that screws over anybody who doesn't cheat). Definitely read the textbook and make sure you memorize terms. She acts like the tests are application based but if you don't know the specific terms you are screwed. Honestly wouldn't be a bad idea to read the textbook chapters before her lectures too, because she her slides ( and therefore her lectures) assume that you are able to memorize terms and their meanings immediately after they're defined which can make portions of lecture harder to follow.

THIS CLASS IS THE WORST with this professor at this time. Let me do a breakdown:
1. I only took this class as a pre-med requirement. (i.e I only took it because I had to, PLUS she seems to be the only Biol 2200 professor for the spring semester, so I couldn't even choose another teacher....very disappointing).
2. Grade Breakdown is very disproportionate: Tests=70%, Lab=20%, and Homework=10% (Exams are the biggest portion of your grade, and I bombed the first and third, so that brought down my entire average--also have a good understanding of the first and third topics: it really helps)
3. Manson's lectures make the material seem easy and doable, but the exams are terrible. Although the class is a pre-med weed out, and it would make sense that the material would be a little more difficult, I took 3 years of Biology in high school including some of the information in this class, and nothing could have prepared me for the structure of these exams. They are all only 40 questions, but terribly worded and inane with nit-picky information Manson did not elucidate on in lecture.
4. That being said, this is how to prepare yourself for this class: 1. RECORD LECTURES (a lot of the stupid things she said in class I thought she said just off-handed or for fun, but were concepts you needed to understand in depth for the exam. 2. Skim the textbook before class (it helps give you a background on the information), 3. the class focuses HEAVILY on Ecology (if this isn't your strong suit like me, you'll have to teach yourself the material, 4. ONLY GO TO OFFICE HOURS IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS (contrary to popular opinion, listening to other people's questions doesn't help you understand the information, or at least it didn't help me! 5. Watch explanation videos online (i.e Crash Course /Bozeman Science) to really comprehend complex processes that Manson glosses over in lecture.
Final Point: Although Professor Manson clearly had a great passion for the ecological subjects she teaches, her extremely difficult exams, poor assistance, and general apathy for her students' numerical success made this class very difficult to enjoy.
I got an A+ in homework and Lab, so really what was extremely difficult were the exams: additionally, although some of the lab information is occasionally on the exams, the 2 hour labs are usually a waste of time and tie in poorly to the class material.
**Tip: focus on understanding concepts and memorizing definitions, rather than memorizing everything because you'll be asked to really "apply knowledge" on the exams rather than know random facts. Trust me, don't take this class unless you need to, or if you actually like ecology.

Dr. Manson is a nice and accommodating instructor, but I believe that her exam difficulty is not reflective of lecture content, most of which is regurgitated from the textbook. Part of this difficulty is how she intentionally speaks in broad terms using words such as "significant" and "associated" when lecturing so what she says is not incorrect but leaves lots of room for interpretation. These words were found on the test, too, making things a bit ambiguous, but evolution is generally an ambiguous subject as well. I found her course to be more challenging than BIOL 2100. I did poorly on the first test but improved two letter grades up on the second. You need to memorize what the textbook says about a concept and apply that sentence to other terms. Also, Dr. Manson likes to put those questions with multiple answers on her tests (I and II only vs I and III only), so you must know where everything falls in relation to one another.

Professor Manson is an average professor. I never went to office hours, but she seemed a tad cold. This class was pretty difficult, more difficult that 2100 with Dave, I would say. Tests were much harder. She would make wording very vague and somewhat ambiguous. I got A's on all of the tests, but I felt like I very well could have got D's on all of them. Many of the questions don't really make sense or have two answers that seem like they could be correct. Labs are determined by your TA's. Some graded very easily and some where very hard on grading, which is simply luck of the draw. The concepts were almost completely new to me even after taking AP Bio. I didn't read before class, but I would recommend reading through the textbook at least once before the test. Also, go through her lectures because she pulls a lot of questions on tests from lectures. 2 or 3 questions on each test are lab based. Overall, I would say this class was slightly harder than Kittlesen's 2100, but very doable at the same time. She also offers up to 1.5% extra credit.

I wouldn't recommend this class unless you're premed or a bio major or need to take it. I got an A in this class as well as 2100 but I preferred 2100 a lot more. The grading breakdown is similar to 2100 except there is one less exam and lab is 20%. The exams are worth 70% and there is 10% in mastering hw. I found Kittlesen to be a lot more entertaining and easier to pay attention to and his lecture difficulty was mimicked by the exams. Manson, however, lectured as if she were teaching a kindergarten class with really simple facts and basic concepts during lecture and then increased the difficulty level a lot on exams. Her lectures are very dry and to be honest it's her personality not the content. It's not the most interesting stuff but it isn't horribly boring either. You'll probably get sick of her cheesy jokes really soon! I would try and put in at least 5-10 hours of studying the week of the exam and you should be fine. The practice exams are useful in that they are practice questions but I never felt like the practice exam was indicative of the real exam's difficulty. Her practice exams are also 30 questions instead of full-length. This semester she gave us the opportunity to take the cumulative exam in order to replace our lowest exam grade if she does that next semester I would definitely try and take it, to be honest, it was the easiest of the 5 exams. I have taken 5 exams for her and I don't think I know the best way to prepare for them even now, but definitely focus on lecture notes and understanding the different questions on the practice exams, why the answer is correct, and what's wrong about other answer choices. Lab as everyone mentioned is entirely dependent on your TA. My friend's TA was really nice and would go over the questions before letting them submit so he got a 100% in the lab, my TA (Maira) was very rude and was a harsh grader. She marked us off for very silly reasons and even told us wrong answers when we asked her. Quizlet all of your HW and do all extra credit it will help you come to the end of the semester. It is definitely doable to get an A/A-. In fact if you work hard and do everything I think it's hard to get below a B+. I wouldn't read the textbook as lecture material is all that she tests on. She will say anything in the 'assigned' readings is fair game but that's BS, she didn't have a single question on the exam that wasn't discussed in lecture/lab, albeit some of her questions were really obscure and dumb. Her wording on exams leaves a lot to be desired as she words questions in very dumb ways so that there are multiple possible answers or the question isn't clear. Good luck, you've got this!