Professor Rossman is extremely knowledgeable and you will learn a lot of information covered in a great amount of detail. However, would not recommend this course to 2nd years and below as it requires experience with UVA history classes to succeed in this class. There are dense readings assigned every week, and a few weeks have films required as well. Lectures are very dense and you must attend to get a grasp on the content (the readings provide contextual information, but the main gist of the course is covered in the lecture). Discussions are graded on attendance but also quality of participation. There are three papers due but each one is only 2 pages double-spaced, and they each are worth 5% so they are low-stress. The mid-term and final are the main portion of the grade and they are mostly composed of short answer and long essay questions. Overall, I throughly enjoyed this class and as a history major, I found the amount of work tolerable as I learned a lot about past events that I had no idea of. Strongly recommend this class for 3rd year and above history majors.

I cannot recommend this class enough! Despite the obviously grim nature of the class, Prof Rossman is an amazing lecturer, and I found myself highly engaged in every single class. My only complaint is that sometimes he goes a little faster than my notetaking (handwritten) can't keep up. He has been teaching this course for a long time, and as a result, he has figured out the most confusing parts of each case study and how to best explain (this is especially important for Yugoslavia and Rwanda). The class goes over 8 case studies, each of which usually has 1 week devoted to them. This means that a large portion of the class is actually themes such as why genocides happen (enlightenment; imperialism/colonialism; nationalism; social psychology; etc) and I would actually say this and the class files/assignments he gives are the MOST important part to study for exams. On that note, there is one midterm, which consisted of 8 paragraph-length short answers referencing class files and one essay, all in 75 minutes online, and one final. The final historically was set up like the midterm except with two essays at the end, but due to cheating in the last semester, he changed it to just 3 essays and no short answer (you're given 4 prompts to choose from). In addition, you also have to write 3 two-page papers throughput the semester. I also took History of Russia since 1917 with prof Rossman, which was set up in the exact same way. Based on both, if you read the class files (the textbook does not matter as it is not included in exams, although it was nice to skim for more background information), go to lectures, and don't procrastinate the papers, you should be able to do excel in the class (I got an A).

This was the first history class I took at UVA and it is an excellent introduction to the department. As a general history course, you get to cover a wide range of time periods and geographical areas. Despite the incredibly grim nature of the subject matter, Prof. Rossman is a very engaging and enjoyable lecturer. The basic points of the lectures are all covered on the slides he posts, but he adds helpful commentary during lecture that is key to succeeding in the course—don't let yourself get in a habit of skipping lecture. For the papers, you will have to complete three in the semester. You'll get a list of topics for paper A that correspond to the material covered that week, and you need to choose one and submit by about a month into the course. Same goes for the other two. They're pretty short, but responding to detailed prompts in 600 words is harder than you'd think. Great medium-effort history course. #tCFFall23

The most interesting and useful class in the history department, congrats to professor Rossman for how he decided to craft this class. A lot of reading, but useful for the exams nonetheless

This class is one of my favorites!! Rossman is so intelligent, and you learn so much about many different genocides across time. I can understand why some might find him pretentious, though I've never felt that. He does tend to ramble sometimes, but everything he has to say is just fascinating information that I don't even mind. I love how he breaks down the definition of genocide in the beginning before we got into cases each week.

It is quite a bit of reading, but you could skim and it'll be fine. If you have a good TA, you'll end up with a good grade. I got an A-, and my papers weren't polished or anything. They were just my thoughts put into paragraphs. I agree the exams might be picky, but they get better as you understand how to take them after the first one. It's really not too much to worry about.

My TA was Laura, and she's amazing!! She's so nice, and discussion was quite fun, as it wasn't just recaps or summaries of class, it was lively group discussions. Sometimes, we'd watch things like some Stanford Prison Experiment documentary or fictional rendition. Although Thomas TAed us one time, and he was much more structured, and we sat in a circle and he went through the lecture, asking us questions and we would elaborate on things. His style helped me understand the lectures much better and streamline what I was learning, whereas with Laura, I was learning more content, though it was more disorganized in my head, but I should've just gone to OH for that. It just depends on how you learn better.

The content was interesting... did not love the professor. With an asynchronous class, there was no communication from him really. Lectures were posted late every week.

I took the class because I thought it was going to be interesting instead of professor Rossmans was very boring and I couldn't focus in class. Additionally, he is very pretentious, and in one of his lectures, he referred to indigenous peoples as Indians which made me very uncomfortable. Your GPA for the class depends on how your TA grades. The tests are very specific and do not give you enough time. I do not recommend this class. It's possible to get an A but it's not worth it.

This has been by far my favorite class at UVA. Professor Rossman is oddly humorous for the topic, but his lecture style kept me engaged in the material. The class is incredibly organized so every week you study a new genocide (with a few exceptions). This structure prevented the class from being too rambly, because there's simply too much information for every lecture so you 100% have to do the readings or else you will get nothing from this class. I've heard students say this was hard but my TA Wu was a pretty mild grader, though you had to participate to do well in discussion. Overall I would definitely recommend this course to anyone who is interested in the history of genocide, or even the development of human rights. Also, do not take this class if you won't do the readings because there are so many expensive books that while enriching, will waste your money if you don't take advantage of them. The last note on the books is that they all cover different topics so it's not like it's repetitive. Finally, the "papers" are 600 words so if you love history but don't want to write (or are inexperienced/ first year nervous about a 3000 level HIST class), this class would be perfect for you.

Grade depends wholly on your TA. Exams ask way too specifically. Not recommend.

This is a really interesting class, but I would only recommend it to History majors, or people very interested in the subject. Rossman is a good professor, although he rambles a bit. You can tell he really loves the class though, and he makes lectures interesting. There's a TON of reading assigned, but as with many history classes you can skip a lot of it and do ok. The grade comes from three essays, midterm, final, and participation in section. The TA Tom was less than stellar and a really harsh grader, but hopefully he won't be back.