CHEM 1411

I got an A+ in this course. It is very easy to do well in this course IF you have a lenient TA. The grading scale is mastered or not yet mastered. You can redo 6 assignments using tokens. You only need around 80% on every assignment to get an A+. There are a few presentations, and two lab reports. The labs themselves are VERY painful because everything is poorly explained. The labs always feel like a game of guess and check, and your lab group makes a big difference. I never met the professor for this class, she introduced herself the first day, but you will likely never see her again. I recommend this course because the grade itself is easy to achieve; however, it is a dreadful class.

Far too much work for a 1-credit class, especially if you are coming into the course without any prior chemistry experience. The prelab and postlab assignments are not difficult - the challenge is creating a plan with your group that allows you to obtain data for something there's a good chance nobody in your group understands. Lab on experiment days is a stressful environment. Be sure to review your plan prior and communicate well with your lab group, delegating tasks if necessary to save time. It is also crucial to have a TA who wants their students to succeed. I was very fortunate to have Summer.

The mastery grading system that is implemented certainly has its advantages. Regardless of if you master an assignment, it is important to revise any errors and complete your understanding of experimental design before the quiz. If you complete all your assignments on time and strategically use your tokens, it isn't difficult to get an A+ in this lab without having to do the final postlab.

The labs you do in these classes are basically like high school chemistry labs. They are very boring, and require so much busy work. There are two labs where you literally just have to sit for like 30 minutes waiting for water to boil. It is such a waste of time. The grading system also is so stupid. Its based off of mastery or non mastery which is confusing and so stupid for a college level class. Everyone says intro chem is a weed out course, but this class is easy. The work you do is easy, its just a lot of work.
#tCFspring2022

You will hear a lot of horror stories about this course, but as an architecture student who made an A, let me tell you that this course is not as bas as people say. Your TA really makes or breaks this class for you. If you get stuck with a really strict TA who is a harsh grader, then this class will be a lot harder for you. Most of the TAs are reasonable, and the course if based on a rather complex mastery system that helps minimize grading differences between TAs. This course is way more work than an 1 credit class should be, but it is a pretty manageable load with a pre-lab and post-lab due every other week and another smaller assignment due on the weeks in between. The most challenging part of the course was writing plans during workshop weeks. I found that 50 minutes was no where near enough time and my group was often very lost. Reading the overview document and working closely with a TA is a must. One nice thing about the course is the token system. At the beginning of the semester you get 6 tokens that you can use to redo an assignment or turn in an assignment late. This can be a lifesaver if you're struggling with a particular assignment type or concept. Overall, this course is not as bad as people say it is as long as you're willing to put in the work and do not get stuck with a harsh TA.

I honestly enjoyed this class a lot and yes, it was more work than needed for a 1 credit class, but it wasn't ever too difficult as long as you watched the prelab videos or went to online office hours. I liked the mastery grading scale because it made it pretty easy to get an A+, as long as you did your work. A lot of lab depends on how well you work with your lab group and if your TA grades generously. #tCFfall22

Can be easier or harder depending on your TA, but pretty easy on the whole. My TA was fantastic. Getting an A or A+ is extremely easy as long as you show up to lab and workshop and do the assignments. Half the weeks, we had "workshop" instead of lab time because there were so many sections running, which was basically just an hour-long session where we planned our experiment. Experiments are not difficult and I think we were only there for anything close to the full three hours twice. Everything is graded as either Mastered or Not Yet Mastered, so don't spend longer on assignments than you need to. Just fulfill the requirements to the best of your ability. #tCFfall22

I think the main thing that makes or breaks this course is the TAs you get, which unfortunately is pretty random. Your lab group also makes a huge difference. I was fortunate enough to get a really chill lab TA, who helped us out when we were confused while performing experiments. My workshop/grading TA was also chill and helped us out when we didn't know what to do while planning our experiments. If we didn't have this help, the class would've been much more difficult, as you really have to plan each experiment entirely on your own without any background knowledge. In terms of work, it's a lot for a one credit class. You have to write plans, prelabs, lab summaries, postlabs, and two full-blown lab reports. You also usually have three quizzes per semester (my class only had two because of the November 13th shooting). You also have to create two presentations on two experiments that your present to the entire class with your lab group. Even though it was a lot of work, the grading system was really nice because it was mastery-based instead of points-based. As long as you got more than 80% of the questions right on an assignment, you got mastery. There's a table that shows you how many masteries you need on each different type of assignment in order to earn each letter grade. One thing that I would recommend is to try to sign up for an odd section number lab because then you are done a week early, as the even sections have a one-week delayed start due to lack of lab availability. #tCFfall22

The first thing people need to understand is that this lab is run and graded by TAs, not Morkowchuk so don't get mad at her. My TA (Paolo) was clearly uninterested and didn't want to be there, but an easy grader. Overall, the lab can be annoying because you can fail an assignment by just a little bit and how to then use a token to redo. Labs were fun and I did like my group, but this class is kind of one you need to just suck up and get through it because its not horrible, but not amazing either.

This is definitely a case of hit or miss with your TA. I had Miles and he was awesome. I also had a great group. I think the titration we did was rushed because of time constraints, but Miles was patient. I cannot say the same for Morkowchuk, she was visibly mad. I actually really enjoyed lab - the experiments, my group, TA, etc. I can definitely see how that would go south if you didn't have all those things I mentioned. I think Miles was great when helping out students and making sure they were prepared for lab. The grading was fair, all the way until the final lab report.

This lab was really annoying for several reasons. The concepts weren't necessarily difficult but instructions are very vague and the TA's are rarely helpful. They give you a very brief overview of the topic then give you a document summarizing of the experiment and expect you to conduct it on your own. Just about every group is confused at first then figures it out as they go. Our lab TA barely spoke English and sometimes didn't even know how to help us. It would definitely help if more focus was placed on learning necessary concepts BEFORE doing each experiment and if TA's were more prepared to help. Fortunately you're almost always working in a group and able to get by ok.
#tCFF23