Skip to main content
Sponsored
SOC 1010 Introductory Sociology
Last taught: Spring 2025
14 Ratings
⏱ Hours/Week
Instructor
Enjoyability
Difficulty
Recommend
Reading
Writing
Groupwork
Other

Grade Distribution

Average GPA
Students Measured

13 Reviews

Add Review
Spring 2025
1.0
Average

DO NOT TAKE THIS CLASS WITH BUCKELEW SHES EVIL I REPEAT SHE IS EVIL!!!! If you are taking this class for a requirement I can guarantee you can find another better class to fulfill it. TO ALL MY PREMEDS TAKE MEDICAL SOC. I am saying this to you as my warning like the grades may be deceiving but this INTRODUCTORY class is so much more work and gave me more headaches than I ever could have expected. Buckelew loves to see her students fail and puts the most obscure questions ever and the formatting of her quizzes are so annoying so even one or two questions wrong will already set you back a substantial amount. She claims that her other points (in class assignments and discussion writing assignments) will help balance out your grade and your lowest quiz is dropped but the questions in the quiz are just so annoying and is not even something that you can prepare for. I am warning you!!! you will regret taking this class please set yourself free (I couldn't unfortunately) so hopefully this will same some other poor unsuspecting soul who just thinks buckelew is someone with nice outfits and a cute soft spoken voice because underneath all that lies something so much scarier.

Instructor 1.0
Enjoyability 1.0
Recommend 1.0
Difficulty 3.0
Hours/Week 5.0
Spring 2025
2.7
Average

I think Professor Buckelew made this class significantly more difficult than it needed to be. The lectures are not recorded and slides are not posted, so you have to go to understand the materials. The discussion section was also pretty important to go to because they lectured during discussion. There was heavy reading and a heavy weight in the overall grade for the class was placed on exams. The exams themselves were unnecessarily hard, and although they were open note and open book, it honestly didn't help because the questions were confusing and were pretty tricky. However, the class was pretty interesting, and Professor Buckelew is a pretty interesting lecturer despite the difficulty of the class and difficulty of comprehension of the lectures.

Instructor 2.0
Enjoyability 3.0
Recommend 3.0
Difficulty 4.0
Hours/Week 3.0
Spring 2021
1.7
Average

Do not take this with Buckelew. She does not teach you what you might need for MCAT and uses her obvious liberal biases in class. We had to write an essay on hook-up culture which is honestly subjective in and of itself. I do not recommend this class, though a B is easy to pull off. TAs were unusually strict and would take off points and not explain why, do not waste your time with this class.

Instructor 2.0
Enjoyability 2.0
Recommend 1.0
Difficulty 4.0
Hours/Week 4.0
Spring 2021
3.0
Average

This course somehow changed its grading system this semester so all the past reviews are non-referable: it's now cumulative. This means that every assignment has points, with a total of 100 points, meaning you have to lose no more than 7 to get an A. No tokens and redos anymore. 4 quizzes, 3 counts. No discussions, no free-talk or chatting in lecture either, a not interactive course at all. There are 2 essays. No Wiki Note Bank or the Discussion Forum or research mini-project. New thing: Memo every week, 5 points each, with ambiguous criteria and world/sentence limit. However, it seems to be extremely hard for actual intro-level students with no background knowledge to get 5 on these, most people get 4, including me, a few who wrote their memo very thoughtfully like a research paper with many references get a 5. Therefore, if the grading this hard, students who get 4 this time would keep on getting 4, losing at least 9 points, probably end up with A- or B+ in the class. Some argue this is probably to scare students so they work hard on it, but that's a terrible and unhealthy strategy that hurts devoted students who tried their best (remember this is an intro class), kills their enthusiasm for the subject and trusts in the course. I committed myself to the course and study hard, spending more than 5 hours outside the course, but it didn't payback. Many of the readings are difficult and long (especially if English is not your first language), some not.
Professor Buckelew is nice, she's a great lecturer, but I don't understand why she suddenly decided to make it hard for students while COVID still goes on. According to previous students, she uses the token grading system because it reduces stress and allows students to redo work, but now she canceled it. I recommend the instructor as I felt her passion and gained a lot, but I won't recommend the layout of the course and the stress it bestowed upon students.

Instructor 5.0
Enjoyability 2.0
Recommend 2.0
Difficulty 4.0
Hours/Week 7.0
Spring 2020
4.0
Average

This course uses specifications grading: each letter has a specific set of requirements that has to be fulfilled in order to get a certain letter grade. This means that every assignment is given a complete or incomplete. You also get 4 tokens at the start of the course. Each time you have to redo an assignment or need an extension on an essay, you have to use up one of your tokens. The number of tokens you have at the end of the course determines whether you will receive a +/solid/- letter grade. You must get 8/10 on each of the quizzes (3 instead of 4 due to COVID-19), miss no more than 2 discussion session (yes, the discussion sessions are mandatory; two lectures and one discussion per week (each is 50 minutes only)), show up to lecture on time, complete all of the essays 2.5-3 pages (3 instead of 4 due to COVID-19), complete the Wiki Note Bank and the Discussion Forum once per unit (these you should do the first week that they are assigned because you can redo for NO PENALTY but you cannot use a token on it once the unit is over), and complete the research mini-project (only for students who want to receive an A-range grade in the course). Professor Buckelew will hand out a 10-page syllabus detailing this grading system, as it is new to many students. If you look at the Spring 2019 grade record, the vast majority of students got A+, including me. If you commit yourself, to the course and study hard to learn the material, you will too. The readings are not too difficult. Out of the 12 teachers I have had this year, Professor Buckelew is the nicest when it comes to grading. She uses this grading system because it reduces stress and allows students to redo work. She is genuinely a very kind, thoughtful, and sincere person. I would recommend going to chat with her during office hours. Many students in the class are Premed students hoping that this class will help them prepare for the MCAT. The content is very very interesting but a lot of it is not needed on the MCAT. But the vocabulary is absolutely vital. Overall, I would highly recommend taking this course with Professor Buckelew.

Instructor 4.0
Enjoyability 3.0
Recommend 5.0
Difficulty 2.0
Hours/Week 5.0
Sponsored
Spring 2020
5.0
Average

Dr. Buckelew is inspirational and powerful. Her class really makes you think of the world differently. She uses a unique grading system that guarantees the grade you want, so your invested effort is really worth the outcome. I highly recommend this class for anyone as your beliefs will be challenged (in a good way).

Instructor 5.0
Enjoyability 5.0
Recommend 5.0
Difficulty 1.0
Hours/Week 7.0
Spring 2020
4.7
Average

Prof. Buckelew has really designed an excellent introductory sociology class in that you get out of it whatever you put in, and you ALWAYS know where your grade stands. She makes it a priority to "reduce student stress" as you will hear her say throughout the entire semester, and make sure that her course is truly accessible to all students. She has used "specifications" grading which seems a bit wack in the beginning, but ultimately makes it so that people that get better grades have to do more work and those who do not want to put in the work get lower grades. It really levels the playing field where you either pass an assignment or fail it (with many chances to redo it if you fail it)! I highly recommend this course with Prof. Buckelew– you will definitely not regret it as long as you come into the class with an open mind, and know that she is truly there for you beyond completing the VERY REASONABLE assignments. Of note, this review was written by a STEM major, so definitely do not be afraid to take this class if you do not fit in the traditional "humanities" category. Just go for it!

Instructor 5.0
Enjoyability 4.0
Recommend 5.0
Difficulty 2.0
Hours/Week 3.0
Spring 2019
3.7
Average

Prof. Buckelew is really great. She uses a grading system that is mostly based on completion (if you follow the guidelines for all the assignments you'll be fine). Lectures were pretty interesting, she does try to make it engaging and I was never bored. Discussion sections are run by the TAs and we would generally review lecture content in groups. I thought the topics we covered were really interesting (plus the books are really cool too). Definitely recommend if you need social science credit!

Instructor 4.0
Enjoyability 3.0
Recommend 4.0
Difficulty 2.0
Hours/Week 0.0
Spring 2019
4.7
Average

Buckelew is the best professor I've had at UVA so far. The new grading system is really good so if you just complete the required coursework you guarantee yourself an A. Basically you get the grade you deserve. A decent amount of reading and you do need to go to lectures/discussions but really an enjoyable class with no final exam.

Instructor 5.0
Enjoyability 4.0
Recommend 5.0
Difficulty 3.0
Hours/Week 6.0
Spring 2019
4.0
Average

This course is a really good intro to sociology and it covers most of the lecture. I really like Buckelew as a professor because she is really enthusiastic about what she is teaching and cares for her student. She allows a lot of opportunity to pass.

Instructor 4.0
Enjoyability 3.0
Recommend 5.0
Difficulty 3.0
Hours/Week 4.0
Sponsored