Your feedback has been sent to our team.
17 Ratings
Hours/Week
No grades found
— Students
I will start off by saying that professor Klubock is no Paul Kershaw -- if you're looking for dramatic action-packed lectures, this is not the place for you. That said, prof. Klubock is very knowledgeable. His lectures are clear and well organized and he regularly asks to make sure there are no lingering questions or issues concerning the course material. The course material: Klubock spent the first month on pre-conquest Latin America (read: Aztecs, Maya, Incas) before moving on to the Spanish conquest itself and colonial rule. The course is broad but Klubock is good at finding specific events and issues to talk about, so despite being a 200-level class, you feel like you are getting more depth. For a 200-level class, however, there is A LOT of reading, close to 175-200 pages a week. Reading is crucial to the course because the midterm, the one 5-page paper, and the final are all based on the reading. The midterm and final, however, are essay tests and prof. Klubock gives out the questions before hand, making it relatively easy to read what you need to read, write an outline, and go into the tests knowing what you will write. The reading is also all secondary sources so it can be dry at times but if you are interested in this period, the reading list provides a good sample of what historians think about the times.
A note on Chris Cornelius. He was the best TA I've had at UVa. He is writing his thesis on colonial Latin America and is therefore more than qualified to TA this class. He knows the stuff in and out. Discussions are worth going to because Chris won't just rehash the reading or the lectures, he'll actually give you a better understanding of the material himself.
Professor Klubock really makes the material come alive, and the lectures are very interesting. Sit near the front because he speaks quietly. The class is graded on discussion attendance, two midterms, and a final. They are short-answer and very straightforward and easy to study for. I really recommend this class, and I'm in the second half of it (2002) right now!
Interesting material and Klubock is a great professor who really strives to ensure that his students understand the material. He is a good lecturer, although he sometimes talks fast so be ready to take notes. There is a fair amount of reading for this class, but it is doable. Your grade consists of participation in discussion (which sometimes includes questions/quizzes on the reading- very easy!!) two midterms and a final. The midterms and final are identification/ short answers concerning major terms and he gives you a study guide in advance. If you go to lecture, do the readings, and participate in discussion you can get a pretty easy A.
This is one of the most boring and mindnumbing classes I've ever taken. The professor speaks super quietly and sometimes spends all class on one slide talking about whatever he feels like. Midterms are just term defining so it's not terribly difficult but get ready for a mindnumbing semester of latin american history for 3 hours a week.
Professor Klubock and the TA, Chloe Porche, was excellent this semester despite the online structure. Simultaneously, there were points where Klubock's lectures became a bit inconsistent, going off on tangents that sometimes became irrelevant to the subject matter. Almost every week, Porche led discussion sections with extreme enthusiasm and passion for ensuring students succeeded and understood the material. She inspired me to participate in discussions actively and to interact with my classmates. She is truly a gem. I recommend students take this class. The exams consisted of five terms with a bonus term, although they were closed-note and had only 50 minutes to complete the exams. Nonetheless, if you adequately studied for the exams and participated in discussions, it is hard not to earn an "A" in HILA 2001.
I am currently in this course and decided to actually make a course forums account to write this review. This class sucks. I am a history major and this has been my least favorite class in the history department so far. I am shocked that so many of the reviews are positive about this class because it has been so bad for me. Don't get me wrong, you can get a decent grade, but be prepared for the most unorganized and uninteresting lectures you have ever been to. Your entire grade is based on three exams which are identifying some of the "key words" that he puts on the board once a week, but he goes over probably 15% of these in class and the rest are in the readings. To do well, just make sure you have all the keywords (he doesn’t post them so you have to go to lectures) and command F them in the online textbooks. Klubock seems like a nice guy, but will repeat the same thing over and over again in lecture to the point that we are over a week behind in lecture so the readings don't even line up. There is no organization so you will never quite be sure whether he is talking about the Aztecs, Incas, or even Spaniards. The actual material is pretty interesting, but it is quite hard to learn from lecture. I am taking Early Modern Europe as well and learned about the Spanish conquest mostly from that class than this one.
The rest of your grade comes from your discussion grade. If you can get Josué as your TA, try to do so. He is very knowledgable and helpful and will spend a lot of discussion going over the things in lecture that did not really make sense. In conclusion, if you need to fulfill a requirement with this class, you probably can get a decent grade with not that much effort. If you are a history major like me and want to really gain something from your history classes, avoid this one at all costs. #tCFfall22
Get us started by writing a question!
It looks like you've already submitted a answer for this question! If you'd like, you may edit your original response.