Idk what everyone else is talking about I LOVED THIS CLASS. Professor Fostel is by far the best professor I have had at UVA-- she is absolutely phenomenal at teaching. If you go to class, you will do well becuase she is so engaging and fantastic at teaching. Everyone that hated this class must have just not gone to class. The problem sets are so doable and the exams are practically the exact same as the problem sets but with different numbers. Raw scores were a little rough (I should have gotten a B based on my exam scores) but then she did some crazy curve at the end and I got an A. Take this class if you are tired of the same old Econ stuff and actually want to learn for once with a professor who cares about you.

DO NOT TAKE THIS COURSE. PERIOD. THIS WAS BY FAR THE HARDEST AND WORST CLASS I HAVE EVER TAKEN. I echo the content and criticisms of the most recent views exactly. They hit this nail on the head PERFECTLY. Do not take this course. Professor Fostel is clearly passionate about the subject, but she's a terrible teacher and this course also had some of the worst TAs I've had at UVA. The test also had legitimately nothing to do with our actual understanding in the course.

The worst ECON class I have taken to date...I honestly would rather go through Intermediate Micro again 10 times over. There are 3 midterm exams, all of which were way too long to complete in the allotted time, not to mention how they test everything BUT your understanding of the topic. You could make the slightest computation error and receive 1-3 points on a 15-point question.

Lecture slides are bloated with complex formulas that I honestly to god couldn't understand or apply. When completing the problem sets I had to sift through the MATLab code just to figure out how to compute a question.

I will say Professor Fostel is clearly very passionate, and she is super approachable during office hours; the TAs, on the other hand...they consistently gave me conflicting information on what will be tested and what won't be. I'm unsure if Professor Fostel is a part of the grading process because when I went to her office hours to ask why I was deducted points for a specific question, she directed me to the TAs? I found this strange because it was her class at the end of the day. But yeah, the TAs will grade your exam like they have a personal vendetta against you.

All in all, do NOT take this class. Take any other ECON elective. It's just not worth it, and it absolutely ruined my semester.

Do not, do not, do not take this class. If you are thinking of taking this class, do not :)

It is nothing like the courseforum. The tests are a total “gotcha” game where they say no proof or no state the theorem and then put it on there anyway. The grading is beyond punitive (I’ve done every pre-req in the Econ major and multiple electives and never had an issue). If you get 1a wrong and that number is used for 1b-e, even if the b-e is perfect outside of that number they give you almost no credit.

I genuinely have no idea how this course forum page came to be unless we just had the worst TAs ever. The lectures are extremely dense and it’s basically reading off long slides the whole time. Literally take anything else — ruined my semester and gave me panic attacks before exams.

Ana Fostel is an absolute joy of a professor. She is so passionate about what she is teaching and is a very engaging professor. The content is challenging, but she is very approachable and helpful with answering questions before exams. I don't normally go to office hours, but since the content is challenging and dense it was really helpful to be able to ask what I need to actually study and know for the exam. Exams are pretty much based exactly off problem sets, and there were 3 midterms and a final. We had 4 problem sets total and they were relatively approachable. We had to use MATLAB to code for some of the answers, and I hate anything coding related, but the TAs usually posted their code and from there is was also an exact copy and paste. There is no outside work to this class with the exception of the 4 problem sets, and only the second one was pretty difficult and took me 7 hour, but the others took me an hour or two. Overall this class is doable, but the content isn't easy so you have to be interested enough to put in the work to do well.

Guys, this is a hard class. Despite the grades shown here on TCF, I was and am currently still STRUGGLING in this class. There are 3 exams, 1 final, and 4 problem sets that require MatLab. I took this class because it was my final semester at UVA and I wanted something chill and interesting that would also be easy and fun, and I thought this course would be more theoretical and talk more about... global financial markets? I WILL SAY, Ana is an awesome lecturer and is super passionate. She is very funny and personable and tries to remember everyone's names and personalities. The course is mostly a lot of math and memorization of theories and equations. If you are good at math, then great. If you struggle in the slightest, not so great! I would prep for these exams at least a week in advance and my highest grade is embarrassing.

This was probably my least favorite ECON course. If you love math and economic proofs this class is for you. The slides are so polluted with mathy formulas and syntax that it takes away from all of the economics. This is basically a math class. I am happy for it to be over. The problem sets are fine but you have to understand how to do the matlab for some because the TA's dont always give you all of the code. The tests are not horrible but our semester averages were pretty bad. The prof might curve the course at the end, but unsure. Also the prof told us that something wouldn't be on the midterm, and then put it on the midterm and made it worth 15% of the midterm. Despite all this, if you can ignore all the material in the slides that is not needed, then they are pretty much like the Problem sets and you can atleast get an 80 on the tests.

Ana Fostel is an amazing professor, but I do have a few things to say about the class. They only give 2 days to finish a really hard problem set, and the course content itself is VERY niche. Some of the topics are applicable to general finance, but very broadly. What we learn about is very specific to the professors theory herself. for example we cite her theorems for some of the exams. The class content is also not what you think it is. You would think Global financial markets would be comparing different ecnonomies from differnet countries, but it is just doing different financial models and the majority of exams are focused on solving these economies, which is really not applicable to any realistic sense other than if youre getting a PHD in econ.

Summary: Professor Fostel might be the most engaging lecturer in the econ department. Fostel's class was mostly theoretical, straight-forward, rewarding, and fair. No discussion section---used as office hours.

Fostel comes to every class with energy, spirit, and kindness and wants all her students to succeed. The first unit (of 5) is pretty much a review of 3010. From there, she slowly adds pieces to the model, such as time and uncertainty. Overall, the class's flow was easy to follow.

The 4 homeworks are odd: 48 hours to complete using MATLAB. There was 1 that was pretty bad, but the rest I did in less than an hour.

The exams were easy if you ACTUALLY PRACTICE THE HOMEWORKS BY HAND, which she tells you to do over and over. but some people obviously don't. I did the appropriate practice and got a 85, 99 and 95 on midterms and 98 on the final, ended with A+, many people got As I think.

I used to wonder about the importance of theoretical economics. From my perspective, I truly believe that solving the economic problem requires more careful thinking instead of constructing a complex model to analyze it. Naturally, I used to be relatively reluctant to accept any models. However, Prof. Fostel proved the importance of the model.

I realized people who apply the concept of the model in the real world are different from people who spend time trying to construct the model. I then understood what this class was trying to teach. It's for students who have a strong passion for research rather than for application.

Both sides, the research and application, are equally important. This class, if you want to pursue a Ph.D. and do something for economics, is highly recommended. Nevertheless, if you want to learn a way to apply the knowledge you obtain and do something for the economy, this may not be a good fit for you.